Carson
GBReliable product, but is changing their pricing model towards something we don't need. We signed up to use InkFilePicker for the picture uploading and storing and it works amazingly! Unfortunately when I last looked to increase our plan with them it appears they have modeled their prices to be more inline with their File uploading competitors. We don't need the cost and overhead of a full file uploading client. We just want to continue utilizing your awesome picture uploading plugin.
Graham Smilebox
GBworth every penny integration was simple, easy for us to implement and easy for our customers to use. also, very cost effective, for the price I could not hire a developer to maintain all of the functionality it offers.
Kavin
GBGreat service, but it cost me $1200 additional to set up API correctly Good product, and great documentation. Unfortunately, with my backbone app, Filepicker API did not work well and was not saving the image correctly. I had to hire a developer to get the issue resolved by creating a image processor on my own server rather than how Filepicker was processing my images and replacing old images with the newest upload. I tried getting support, but no solid solution was found immediately.
Andrew
GBFor this price, I'd like more features and customization **** FEATURE REQUEST***** Why doesn't Filepicker allow me to upload multiple photos at a time? ____________ Filepicker is one of my most expensive API/service providers. For the money they charge, I think they will have to improve the UI design, offer more design flexibility, remove their branding entirely, and increase the number of files that each tier offers. Otherwise, I will probably find another option, or build something, to access Facebook and Instagram photos.
Dwight Gunnarson
GBGreat Product, Easy to Implement, Very Poor with Rackspace This is a slick program but if you need urls from your Rackspace storage, forget it. It is their policy not to put the urls in the returned json. So good luck trying to store those urls. Ugh.