
Kavin
GBGreat service, but it cost me $1200 additional to set up API correctly Good product, and great documentation. Unfortunately, with my backbone app, Filepicker API did not work well and was not saving the image correctly. I had to hire a developer to get the issue resolved by creating a image processor on my own server rather than how Filepicker was processing my images and replacing old images with the newest upload. I tried getting support, but no solid solution was found immediately.

Andrew
GBFor this price, I'd like more features and customization **** FEATURE REQUEST***** Why doesn't Filepicker allow me to upload multiple photos at a time? ____________ Filepicker is one of my most expensive API/service providers. For the money they charge, I think they will have to improve the UI design, offer more design flexibility, remove their branding entirely, and increase the number of files that each tier offers. Otherwise, I will probably find another option, or build something, to access Facebook and Instagram photos.

Jo
IEPoor cropping options and urls. Our main issue has been using the images, the cropping api is a poor substitute for having control over your own images. Poor mobile experience. It would also be useful to have full control over the url that is given out on the links (even if it just says not file picker).

Kirill
GBWorks but not maintained File picker was/is a great idea, but ever since buying it from the original team, you have dropped the ball -- documentation is shiitake and updates are few. You can make this the best file picking product, and instead u r keeping it in the state it was two years ago. Only a matter of when a better product is created

Graham Smilebox
GBworth every penny integration was simple, easy for us to implement and easy for our customers to use. also, very cost effective, for the price I could not hire a developer to maintain all of the functionality it offers.