A.
RUTransparent P2P I trust most of my investments to the service of this company (Paskolu klubas in Lithuania), mainly because of their transparency.
Romuald
LTGood idea, but big room to improve Idea is good, but not simple enough. System requires massive checkboxes and confirmations on every loan. Sms codes are extremely annoying making manual investments on many loans nearly impossible at reasonable time. I have tried many similar platforms and guys, you have solid room to improve. Due to this complexity and time consumption you are not my primary platform even if i like it conceptually. Romuald
Jose Vanderveken
ESKeep on going the good thing Until today only positive experience with the NeoFinance possibility to invest. Also good client help at the client helpdesk when answers were needed. Keep on going folks the way you are offering people the possibility to let their (invested)money work for them.
Aleksas Sinkevicius
GBI would not recommend I would not recommend. It looked promising at the begining, but the way they implement new fees is pushing away new investors. It's absolute true about bad loans and a bit shady activity behind the scene - you will notice that when you start investing - at most cases you'll get only bare details about your customer/applicant which is quite difficult to rely on for investor, and that was one of the biggest factors moved me away from Neo.
Marius
LTGreat, but need to impove some points Notification system about movements in account or auto investment options is limited. The investment protection option too expensive, as they collect more than required, so able to re-invest this money in other loans to increase their profit instead of reducing protection costs for users, which looks not fair. No info about how much protection fund already collected.