VehicleHistoryRecord.com

image
3.85
Based on 20 Reviews

5

0.00%

4

95.00%

3

0.00%

2

0.00%

1

5.00%
About VehicleHistoryRecord.com

Tags

You need to Login first to submit your review.

image
Pam A
GB

SCAM SCAM. Afifah Amani pretended to be Steve +44 7389 645092 interested in my car to get me to use site, then came up with story of why couldn't view car etc etc

image
Eric Johnson
GB

Process takes too long Excellent info at a great price. Useful sitting in my living room, would like the process to be faster so it could be used on the street while looking at a car.

image
Do Si
GB

Woo hoo! Not bad for the price, but a little less "continue" buttons, would be even better!! I appreciated the report, but would have appreciated the price just being $1.95 to begin with, and include what most people would expect to be in a standard report, instead of asking one if they would like that. Duh!! Of course, that's why I'm paying for a REPORT!! Great service otherwise, and provided fairly quickly!! I would recommend it again, but please, less "continue" buttons.

image
Ronald Reisen
GB

low cost & informative Vehiclehistoryrecord.com is a great inexpensive way to get a vehicle history report. It only costs a buck, but be careful not to order a years worth of reports -- you have to decline that offer if it's not what you want.

image
Rachel
GB

Pretty good - however 21 pages is a bit much VehicleHistoryRecord.com gives quite a bit of information. A bit contradictory, however. On item # 3 "History of The Vehicle" it shows that the vehicle was reported to have been in a collision with another vehicle but does not show this information in any of the other table of contents (1 - 20).......... It also shows "Reported at Auto Auction" - but does not explain what this means. Shows the title was repossessed, reported at auto auction - again - what does this mean? I would think that these questions would have been explained under "Brand Definitions" - it does show "No Collision" and explains that the vehicle has not been reported to have been damaged by a collision." Does this mean the "collision" that was reported in July 2008 caused no damage but did result in an assigned case number? Like I said, there is quite a bit of information in this report, however, it could be consolidated a bit.

We may use cookies or any other tracking technologies when you visit our website, including any other media form, mobile website, or mobile application related or connected to help customize the Site and improve your experience. learn more

Allow