customer
NLGo woke go broke One of the many companies that are a prime example of: "go woke, go broke". IGN has lost its touch as THE go-to place for videogames, where the reviews were before written by true gamers, all that matters now is howmuch diversity and wokeism is in a game, a good example of a sweet baby inc and blackrock puppet.
Paulo
GBThis game is a product of Misleading… This game is a product of Misleading advertising, in a moment of crisis to the world. When a company like IGN gives 10/10 to "The last of us" part 2, it only means one thing: THEY WERE PAID to give that review to the game. Naughty Dog basically stole ideas from several different games or movies: 1 when you are detected, the sound is the same as "Thief Deadly Shadows" ; 2- story - they kill an important character of the game with a head smash like Negan does at "The Walking Dead. At least they changed to a golf club... 3 The walkers come from" Dead Island" 4 Swimming pools and some prefabs are the same as the ones on "Fallout 4" and the scenarios in many ways are just like "Red Dead Redemption ". 5 Not to mention that from the beggining they just copied everything from "Uncharted" to make "The Last of us". When you're aiming, your character walks in that direction. This is annoying and for a game "10/10" is not acceptable! They should have made the difference for the others! I believe this is a bug that nobody can fix? The only incredible thing in this game, are the graphic details and a decent game mechanic. For this, it should get a maximum of 6/10. If you think about the emotional side of the characters, it makes me sick. Basically the "modern world" where two girls fall in love and go for an adventure of revenge together. Seriously, is this the best you can do? Sorry, this game is only a 5/10.
Johannes
DKIGN on mobile is a tragedy I have chosen to wait writing this review in case it was fixed at some point (wishful thinking), but this has been an issue since I have started using IGN on my mobile up to over a year ago. While IGN has served well on some fronts hence two stars in lieu of one, using the website on a mobile is beyond infuriating. The ads on pages fill up the screen and laid in so slowly that when you tap somewhere on the page, you click the ads instead. When watching videos, the ad that plays before (if you are lucky) will sometimes load only its audio for up to 15 seconds and be unskippable after the regular five seconds. The video player sometimes snaps incorrectly so that you cannot exit or change what part of a video you want to watch due to it filling up too much of the screen to tap either out of it or pause it; this has never been an issue on other sites with my device. Furthermore, if you are plagued by an add that has an X to close, it will sometimes be untappable on the video itself. While I get some enjoyment from the videos, it'd be far more enjoyable with a player that works and if it is ever fixed, I will happily change this review. Until then, it is: Awful and unenjoyable.
MemoryZone
NONo thank you. Some reviews on games just don't make sense at all, looks like they were written by complete amateurs, its baffling sometimes. Most reviews are either extremely biased or just straight up wrong with pretty hilarious reasons. It seems the site favours corporations over the actual gamers.
kyle kitchens
GBReviews a game 4/10 (Cyberpunk) Reviews a game 4/10 (Cyberpunk), because certain systems can't handle it, "Xbox one & ps4" (base consoles). Gives no review of the actual game itself, story, game mechanics, world, character building, etc. Sure it has bugs & glitches that need to be addressed, which are all fixable. That's like reviewing a new car and giving it a 0/10 cause it didn't have gas in it...